Office of Administrative Hearings
Skip to: Content | Footer
 

PWCA Arbitrator Evaluation Form

Arbitrator Evaluation
Arbitrator evaluations are confidential and are designed to provide the PWCA Committee with useful information in evaluating and maintaining the quality of the PWCA Program and arbitrators.

Please rate the arbitrator 1 - 5 (1 being the lowest - 5 being the highest)

Instructions:
1) Select an Arbitrator
2) Select a Case Number
3) Fill out form and hit the 'Submit' button

Your Name:  Optional
Arbitrator:  <------Select Arbitrator
Case Number:
Case Name:
1. How was the demeanor of the arbitrator toward the parties, counsel and witnesses? Rating:
2. How prompt was the arbitrator in contacting the parties? Rating:
3. How fair or effective was the arbitrator in scheduling the arbitration and discovery proceedings? Rating:
4. How would you rate the arbitrator's efforts in moving the arbitration process to a speedy conclusion? Rating:
5. How prepared was the arbitrator in addressing discovery matters? Rating:
6. How effective was the arbitrator in addressing discovery issues? Rating:
7. How would you rate the arbitrator's fairness in handling discovery? Rating:
8. How prepared was the arbitrator in handling the arbitration issue? Rating:
9. How would you rate the arbitrator's knowledge and skill in handling the legal issues of the arbitration? Rating:
10. How would you rate the arbitrator's knowledge and skill in handling the technical issues of the arbitration? Rating:
11. How would you rate the arbitrator's fairness in handling the arbitration proceedings? Rating:
12. How would you rate the arbitrator's efforts to issue a ruling that explained the findings of fact and conclusions of law for each of the issues in the arbitration? Rating:
13. How would you rate the likelihood that you would use this arbitrator again? Rating:
14. How would you rate the quality of the list of arbitrators? Rating:
15. Which aspects of the process did you like or dislike the most?
16. What suggestions for improvements do you have?

Updated : 10/9/2007